Talk:Alli Danziger - Revision history

Skeeta: /* Coincidence? */

2007-01-29T01:17:23Z

Coincidence?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 29 January 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:

	She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)		She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)

	~~:what? are you serious? who was she?--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 19:15, 28 January 2007 (CST)~~

	== Nikki B says "I am not canon" ==		== Nikki B says "I am not canon" ==

	[http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=170690#170690 Nikki's denial] --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 00:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)		[http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=170690#170690 Nikki's denial] --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 00:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Skeeta: /* Coincidence? */

2007-01-29T01:15:38Z

Coincidence?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 29 January 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:

	She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)		She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)

			:what? are you serious? who was she?--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 19:15, 28 January 2007 (CST)

	== Nikki B says "I am not canon" ==		== Nikki B says "I am not canon" ==

	[http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=170690#170690 Nikki's denial] --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 00:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)		[http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=170690#170690 Nikki's denial] --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 00:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Brucker: Nikki B says "I am not canon"

2007-01-26T06:30:12Z

Nikki B says "I am not canon"

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 26 January 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:

	She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)		She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)

			== Nikki B says "I am not canon" ==

			[http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=170690#170690 Nikki's denial] --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 00:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Jbshryne at 06:05, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T06:05:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 26 January 2007
Line 25:		Line 25:

	:I know what you mean. Back in Sept. I actually liked Bree ''better'' than Jess, but now that Bree has gone psycho and Jess has gotten more composed in her public appearances, she is def my girl. I like almost every Keira Knightley movie character, but when I see her in interviews I find her really annoying. Interesting.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:I know what you mean. Back in Sept. I actually liked Bree ''better'' than Jess, but now that Bree has gone psycho and Jess has gotten more composed in her public appearances, she is def my girl. I like almost every Keira Knightley movie character, but when I see her in interviews I find her really annoying. Interesting.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)

			==Coincidence?==

			She was in [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104990/fullcredits Newsies]. I ''love'' it!! ~ [[User:Jbshryne\|Jbshryne]] 00:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)

JayHenry at 05:21, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T05:21:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 26 January 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::::Ah, it was not known by me.--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 23:19, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::Ah, it was not known by me.--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 23:19, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			:::::I had added it on [[MySpace]], and it's on [[HyeMew]] too, but I see now that it's misleading on the most important place, which is [[Daniel]].--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:21, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

Brucker at 05:19, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T05:19:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 26 January 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			::::Ah, it was not known by me.--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 23:19, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

JayHenry at 05:03, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T05:03:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 26 January 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

	Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)		Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)

			:I know what you mean. Back in Sept. I actually liked Bree ''better'' than Jess, but now that Bree has gone psycho and Jess has gotten more composed in her public appearances, she is def my girl. I like almost every Keira Knightley movie character, but when I see her in interviews I find her really annoying. Interesting.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)

Brucker at 04:52, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T04:52:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 26 January 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

	Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)		Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)

Brucker: Bizarre semi-off-topicness

2007-01-26T04:49:18Z

Bizarre semi-off-topicness

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 26 January 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)

			== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

			Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)

JayHenry at 04:48, 26 January 2007

2007-01-26T04:48:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 26 January 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I thought the "event" template was for "Breeniverse" events. Not real world stuff. But if you think we should use it for this that's fine with me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:06, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:I thought the "event" template was for "Breeniverse" events. Not real world stuff. But if you think we should use it for this that's fine with me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:06, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 26 January 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			::::I guess we just have to note the nuance in the status. And that sometimes we can't make the canon v. not-canon call. I think we need to do some work on [[canon]] and [[breeniverse]] to flesh out these issues. FWIW, it's Danielbeast's MySpace that says Paulmark is the real Paul -- but Danielbeast's MySpace, like the Owen MySpace, is known to be fan operated.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

	Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)		Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)

			:I know what you mean. Back in Sept. I actually liked Bree ''better'' than Jess, but now that Bree has gone psycho and Jess has gotten more composed in her public appearances, she is def my girl. I like almost every Keira Knightley movie character, but when I see her in interviews I find her really annoying. Interesting.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:03, 25 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 26 January 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			::::Yeah, and what threshhold exists for determining canonicity. Danielbeast's YouTube page is now claiming that Paulmark18 is the real Paul, and as I said, Bree has the lg362436 videos in her favorites, the only non-canon favorites she has, which might suggest they are canon, but of course I really doubt it. And you've suggested Nikki be made canon, but I think it's still too vague to tell. How do we determine this stuff? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)

	== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==		== Bizarre semi-off-topicness ==

	Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)		Does anyone else have this experience? I'm finding it oddly the case that although they should be the essentially same person, I often feel differently about the attractiveness of an actor/actress and the person they play in a role. In this particular case, while I thought Nikki B. was cute, I gotta say that Alli D. is somehow even cuter. Likewise, I find Jessica Rose to be cuter than Bree. And it's not just a preference for a real person over a role, because in the case of Jennifer Connelly, I've thought she was very pretty in every movie I've seen her in, but I've never though she looked attractive at all as herself. Is that weird? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:49, 25 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 26 January 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I thought the "event" template was for "Breeniverse" events. Not real world stuff. But if you think we should use it for this that's fine with me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:06, 25 January 2007 (CST)		:I thought the "event" template was for "Breeniverse" events. Not real world stuff. But if you think we should use it for this that's fine with me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:06, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)		::All Breeniverse events happen in videos, don't they? It seems like we'd never use it if that was the case. I think it should be used for real world stuff that is highly important to our understanding of the Breeniverse and/or OpAphid. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:44, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			:::Well, an example of a Breeniverse event that didn't happen in a video is the hijacking of Gemma's YouTube account, the chats, that sort of stuff. If we want to include non-Breeniverse events, we should probably figure out what the threshhold is to deserve a mention.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:48, 25 January 2007 (CST)